CFPA Q&A: Describe The Bureau's Rulemaking Authority.

Expansive. The Consumer Financial Protection Act's ("CFPA") Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection ("Bureau") will not only be big, but it will have broad and sweeping rulemaking authority. Specifically, the Bureau's Director, once selected and confirmed, will have the power to "prescribe rules . . . as may be necessary or appropriate to enable the Bureau to administer and carry out the purposes and objectives of the Federal consumer laws, and to prevent evasions thereof." The Bureau's purpose is "ensuring that all consumers have access to markets for consumer financial products and services and that markets for consumer financial products are services are fair, transparent, and competitive." The Bureau's objectives include exercising its authority to ensure that, among other things:

  • consumers get timely and understandable information about consumer financial products;
  • outdated and burdensome regulations are modified to reduce unwarranted regulatory burdens;
  • the Federal consumer financial law is consistently enforced; and
  • consumers are protected from discrimination, and unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and practices.

In short, the CFPA's virtually all-encompassing rulemaking power covers almost every aspect of most consumer financial products.   

Learn More About The Bureau And The CFPA

Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act creates a new comprehensive statutory framework and federal regulatory watchdog to deal with the offering and provision of consumer financial products or services.  There is little doubt that this legislation will have a major impact on the financial industry going forward.  To learn more, join the August 2, 2010 Web conference "Consumer Financial Protection Act: What Lenders Need to Know." 

Death Knell Ringing For An Independent CFPA?

Nobody knows the banking system like the Fed. What better place, then, to house a consumer financial protection agency (CFPA)? The Fed's insight into the banking system leaves it well-positioned to develop, coordinate, and implement new and existing rules applicable to credit cards and other consumer financial services products. Rather than create a completely new federal bureaucracy to govern the regulation of consumer financial services products, as proposed by the House of Representatives, the Senate proposes a more measured response: house the CFPA in the Fed.

As Craig Torres and Yalman Onaran of Bloomberg Business Week are reporting in their article, "Consumer Agency Within Fed Seen as Victory for Banking Industry," the debate about whether to have an independent CFPA boils down to this:

Banks say placing the agency with the Fed alleviates their concern that an independent entity would ignore the health of the financial system. Consumer advocates say it’s a mistake because the Fed didn’t succeed in curbing abuses during the subprime lending boom that contributed to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

Representative Barney Frank, chair of the powerful House Financial Services Committee, calls the Senate proposal "a joke," and has lashed out at the Fed, calling its track record of consumer protection its "most conspicuous failure." On the other hand, Senator Chris Dodd, chair of the Banking Committee, is pushing a CFPA that "would create a bureau within the Treasury Department or within a new overarching bank regulator that would have authority to write consumer-protection rules."

So what is the likely outcome? Negotiations in Washington are accelerating, but the issue is so divisive that attempts to find middle ground could thwart the entire effort. As Jim Kuhnhenn reported in the AP, "Dodd, Corker regulatory offer gets cool reception," when the new proposal came up yesterday in the Banking Committee, it achieved virtually no traction.

Stay tuned...

More News on the Potential Fate of the CFPA

It looks like the proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency may never see light of day. Republicans and democrats appear to be at an impasse over the amount of power and independence the CFPA would have. Senator Dodd has publicly stated that he will not go ”begging” for the 60th vote in the Senate, which makes the passage of the previously envisioned, all-powerful and independent CFPA highly unlikely. Read more here.

Senate at Impasse on Financial Reform

After reaching “an impasse” in negotiations with Senate Republicans on financial regulatory reform, Senator Dodd has stated that he will begin drafting legislation to present to the Senate Banking Committee. It will be interesting to see if Senator’s Dodd’s proposal appeases any Republicans since the Democrats no longer have 60 votes in their caucus.

Here is an article analyzing the differences between the House bill and the latest Senate approach.

Barney Frank Fires Back At "Innaccuracies"

Representative Barney Frank, chair of the House Financial Services Committee (“FSC”), has issued a memorandum to the members of the FSC addressing certain issues raised by various news publications. The substance of the memorandum is as follows:

Some inaccuracies have appeared in the press about institutions exempted from the reach of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency in the House-passed financial reform bill. For instance, yesterday’s New York Times reported that it “exempted smaller community banks, credit unions, retail merchants …”. Not true. All of those institutions will be subject to all rules issued by the agency with respect to the extension of credit. They also will be subject to agency enforcement. The exemption for smaller financial institutions is only with respect to examination which will continue to be the responsibility of the institutions’ prudential regulators. However, the CFPA will have back-up inspection authority and may independently take enforcement action. And even this exemption is limited to institutions with less than 2% of bank assets.

Importantly, the new agency will also have authority with respect to the now lightly or unregulated institutions such as pay day lenders and check cashers firms which are especially important to lower income families. It also will have authority over independent mortgage brokers and lenders that led the industry in issuing subprime and abusive option ARM mortgages.

Consumer protection has long been a weak link in our system of financial regulation and the meltdown of the subprime mortgage market is only the most dramatic example of the consequences of our failure in this area. The President’s position on closing this gap is of great importance.

Leading consumer protection advocates unanimously support the President. Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren said when the House bill passed, “the banks lost today.” That same day, Travis Plunkett from the Consumer Federation of America said that “The CFPA will allow consumers to shop or take out a loan knowing that there is an agency looking out for their best interests.”

Click here to read the memo as it appears on the FSC’s website.

Dodd Watch: Will He Abandon The CFPA?

Speculation continues about what will happen to the pending legislation promoted by retiring and now lame duck senator Chris Dodd. That legislation, of course, includes the creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency (“CFPA”) and a whole host of bureaucratic additions to the federal government. You can read more about that from us by clicking here and here. The Wall Street Journal is now reporting that, in order to get something passed this year, Senator Dodd may jettison the CFPA as an independent agency, favoring instead a new body within an existing agency like the Treasury Department. If true, this proposal is a far cry from what the White House originally contemplated. We’ll keep you posted. Read more from the Journal article here.

The Amended CFPA Passes The House; Financial Reform Debate Moves To Senate

By a close vote (223-202), the House passed H.R.4173 — the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“WSRCPA”) – on December 11, 2009. The WSRCPA includes the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act (“CFPA”).

Significantly, one of the major sticking points prior to passing the WSRCPA was the creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency (the proposed new bureaucracy under the CFPA is discussed here). An amendment to the CFPA was introduced that would have created a council of regulators housed at the Treasury Department comprised of various existing regulators of banks and other financial institutions. The amendment failed, however, and the CFPA made it through the House with the Agency in tact.

On the controversial preemption provisions of the CFPA, an amendment passed to allow States to issue tougher consumer protection requirements than those contained in the CFPA, but the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) will have the power to veto State standards if the OCC determines that the standards affect bank operations in a material way. Under the WSRCPA, the OCC will become part of the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Other amendments to the CFPA include adding oversight by the new Agency on reverse mortgages, and modifying the Agency’s leadership structure to have the Director ultimately transfer power to a board appointed by the President.

The close vote in the House suggests that all the financial reform legislation will be subject to fierce debate in the Senate, and potentially the development of some alternative to the proposed Agency to be created under the CFPA. Stay tuned to The Bulletin for further developments.

Getting To Know The CFPA: Part I - The New Bureacracy

With the debate over the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act (“CFPA”) about to hit the floor of the House of Representatives, there is no better time than now to start digesting the massive reforms proposed by the CFPA.

Will the CFPA pass? Most agree that the CFPA will see several amendments before it comes close to a final vote in both houses of Congress, particularly because the CFPA is part of the larger Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 (“WSRCPA”). At the moment, there are over 250 proposed amendments to the WSRCPA in the House. Of those, only about two dozen are likely to see the floor of the House for debate, which could begin as early as today. The clock is ticking, of couse. There are only eight to 10 days left in the current legislative session.

Breakdown of the CFPA

The WSRCPA is a conglomeration of several pieces of proposed legislation directed at financial industry reform, including the Financial Stability Improvement Act, the Corporate and Financial Institution Fairness Act, the Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets Act, and several other pieces of related legislation. In other words, in addition to consumer protection, the omnibus WSRCPA addresses credit rating agencies, “too big to fail” financial institution, and derivatives, among other topics. If you are interested in reviewing the entire 1279 pages of the WSRCPA, click here.

The CFPA itself is over 350 pages long and consists of seven subtitles. This special series on the CFPA will provide a detailed review of the statute as it currently stands, beginning with this installment on the establishment of a new bureaucracy to oversee financial institutions and the regulation of consumer financial products.

The New Bureaucracy

The Agency
The CFPA establishes a Consumer Financial Protection Agency (the “Agency”), which will be “an independent agency created to regulate the provision of consumer financial products or services” under the CFPA and 13 other “enumerated consumer laws,” such as the Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The Agency will be headquartered in Washington, D.C. and headed by a Director appointed for a five-year term by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Director “may exercise all executive and administrative functions of the Agency,” which includes rule making powers.

Specific Functional Units
The Agency will have several “Specific Functional Units.” First, the Agency will have a Research Unit, whose functions will include research on things like consumer financial counseling and education and consumer financial products. Second, the Agency will include a Community Affairs Unit. The functions of this unit include “providing information, guidance, and technical assistance regarding the provision of consumer financial products or services to traditionally underserved consumers and communities.”

Third, the Agency will have a Consumer Complaints Unit. The Consumer Complaints Unit will establish a central database for the collection and tracking of consumer complaints about consumer financial products or services. Finally, the Agency will establish a Consumer Financial Education Unit “whose functions shall include activities designed to facilitate the education of consumers on consumer financial products and services . . . .”

The Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity
In addition to the Specific Functional Units, the Agency is required to establish the Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity (the “Office”) within the first six months of the enactment of the CFPA. The Office’s delegated powers include overseeing and enforcement of federal laws, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Home Mortgage Foreclosure Act, which are intended “to ensure the fair, equitable, and nondiscriminatory access to credit . . . .”

The Board
The Director of the Agency will be advised by the Consumer Financial Protection Oversight Board (the “Board”). The Board will be composed of 12 members, broken down into two component parts. First, seven of the 12 members will be as follows:

  1. The chair of the Board of Governors;
  2. The head of the agency responsible for chartering and regulating national banks;
  3. The chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;
  4. The chair of the National Credit Union Administration;
  5. The chair of the Federal Trade Commission;
  6. The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; and
  7. The chair of the liason committee of representatives of State agencies to the Financial institutions Examination Council.

Second, the President gets to appoint the remaining five members of the Board (with the advice and consent of the Senate) from “among experts in the field,” representatives of banks that ”primarily serve underserved communities,” and representatives of communities “that have been signficantly impacted by higher-priced mortgage loans.” Of these five nominated members, no more than three can be from the same political party.

The Consumer Advisory Board
The Director of the Agency is required to establish a Consumer Advisory Board (the “Advisory Board”). The Advisory Board will assist the Director in exercising the functions of the Director and “to provide information of emerging practices in the consumer financial products or services industry.”

Membership on the Advisory Board will include experts in the relevant fields (e.g., financial services, community development, consumer protection, etc.) and representation of the interests of the consumers covered by the CFPA. The Advisory Board’s membership may not consist of more than 50% plus one of any single political party.

The Agency Telephone and Internet Hotlines
Pursuant to the CFPA, the Agency is required to set up a single toll-free hotline for consumer complaints and inquiries. Incoming calls are to be routed to the regulatory agency that is primarily responsible for supervising the financial institution that is the subject of the call. Calls may also be routed to appropriate State agencies under certain conditions.

Within six months of the enactment of the CFPA, the various federal financial institution regulatory agencies are required to report to Congress on their efforts to establish an interagency website for “directing and referring” consumer complaints and inquiries to the Agency. The CFPA does not set a deadline for the website to go live.

What’s Next?

The Bulletin will continue to monitor the debate on the CFPA. Check back frequently for news updates, as well as Part II of the “Getting to Know the CFPA” series: The Powers of the New Bureaucracy.

Are You Prepared? The Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009

This week, the House of Representatives will be debating the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 (“CFPA”), which is now part of the omnibus Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009. Stay tuned to The Bulletin for the latest on the CFPA debate, as well as a multi-part series reviewing the various provisions of CFPA. The “Getting To Know The CFPA” series kicks off with an overview of the massive bureaucracy that will be set up following the passage of the Act.

Click here to to read the first installment.

Debate Rages On Over Structure Of Consumer Financial Protection Agency

Representatives Barney Frank and Henry Waxman are debating the leadership structure of the agency to be created by the pending Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009. Rep. Frank is looking for a structure with a single director whereas Rep. Waxman is looking for leadership in the form of a five member bipartisan commission. For more on this debate, see The Hill’s Blog here and here.